Business Law Clarkson 12th Edition Powerpoint Backgrounds

Business Law Clarkson 12Th Edition Powerpoint Viewer. Business Law Clarkson 13th Edition Speak up, it’s not like you had your tongue cut.” “It’s.

In the 13th edition of Business Law: Text and Cases, the authors, Kenneth W. Clarkson et al., provide a fresh perspective on a traditional subject. Students will benefit from the updated and concise presentation style. The authors cover of a wide breadth of material related to business and corporate law. They effortlessly integrate classical legal concepts with an innovative, modern approach using examples from everyday life. This text raises the standards of excellence for both teachers as well as students. By challenging learners to apply practical solutions to realistic situations, students can prepare for entry into a fast-paced and information-driven economy.

Business Legal Studies The pedagogical methods used in the 13th edition cover essential topics while laying the groundwork for future studies. The new layout is designed to simplify concepts and make the legal principles accessible to the student. Through numerous examples, which are designed to pique interest and stimulate curiosity, the authors impart an elegant view of the subject matter. Teachers can benefit from the additional materials provided to enhance the learning environment, increase critical thought and stimulate classroom discussions.

Learning Business Law The foundation concepts are slowly elaborated in this masterful edition. The updated material reflects current events, which keeps a sense of relevance and timeliness while engaging classical formulas. Additional sections were added to expand on current trends in ethics, global governance and corporate cultural changes. The material touches on historical court rulings as well as contemporary interpretations of key concepts that build on legal precedence. The current legal environment is integrated into this edition, so students can apply the principles of business law to the most pressing issues facing the modern professional.

The text is written with a user-friendly approach in mind, and this reduces confusion while keeping the material relevant. Numerous cases are used throughout the text to highlight key concepts. The authors carefully discuss each concept, so it can be understood by students who approach the subject at different levels. Sample questions asked in the 13th edition of Business Law: Spotlight on Smart Inventions—Piercing the Corporate Veil. Thomas Persson and Jon Nokes founded Smart Inventions, Inc., to market household consumer products.

The success of their first product, the Smart Mop, continued with later products, which were sold through infomercials and other means. Persson and Nokes were the firm’s officers and equal shareholders. Persson was responsible for product development, and Nokes was in charge of day-to-day operations. By 1998, they had become dissatisfied with each other’s efforts. Nokes represented the firm as financially “dying,” “in a grim state,... Worse than ever,” and offered to buy all of Persson’s shares for $1.6 million.

Persson accepted. On the day that they signed the agreement to transfer the shares, Smart Inventions began marketing a new product—the Tap Light. It was an instant success, generating millions of dollars in revenues. In negotiating with Persson, Nokes had intentionally kept the Tap Light a secret.

Naruto Vs Pain Bahasa Indonesia Full Fight. Persson sued Smart Inventions, asserting fraud and other claims. Under what principle might Smart Inventions be liable for Nokes’s fraud?

Is Smart Inventions liable in this case? Smart Inventions, Inc., 125 Cal.App.4th 1141, 23 Cal. Rptr.3d 335 (2 Dist. 2005)] (See page 771.) Suppose that you contract to purchase steel at a fixed price per ton. Before the contract is performed, a lengthy steelworkers’ strike causes the price of steel to triple from the price specified in the contract. If you demand that the supplier fulfill the contract, the supplier will go out of business.

What are your ethical obligations in this situation? What are your legal rights?

QUESTION WITH SAMPLE ANSWER: Risk of Loss. On May 1, Sikora goes into Carson’s retail clothing store to purchase a suit. Sikora finds a suit he likes for $190 and buys it.

The suit needs alterations. Sikora is to pick up the altered suit at Carson’s store on May 10. Consider the following separate sets of circumstances: (a) One of Carson’s major creditors obtains a judgment on the debt Carson owes and has the court issue a writ of execution (a court order to seize a debtor’s property to satisfy a debt) to collect on that judgment all clothing in Carson’s possession.

Discuss Sikora’s rights in the suit under these circumstances. (b) On May 9, through no fault of Carson’s, the store burns down, and all contents are a total loss. Between Carson and Sikora, who suffers the loss of the suit destroyed by the fire? Negotiable Instruments Sabrina Runyan writes the following note on a sheet of paper: “I, the undersigned, do hereby acknowledge that 1 owe Leo Woo one thousand dollars, with interest, payable out of the proceeds of the sale of my horse, Lightning, next month. Payment is to be made on or before six months from date.” Discuss specifically why this is not a negotiable instrument. A Question of Ethics: Discrimination Based on Disability.

Titan Distribution, Inc., employed Quintak, Inc., to run its tire mounting and distribution operation in Des Moines, Iowa. Robert Chalfant worked for Quintak as a second shift supervisor at Titan. He suffered a heart attack in 1992 and underwent heart bypass surgery in 1997. He also had arthritis.

In July 2002, Titan decided to fire Quintak. Chalfant applied to work at Titan. On his application, he described himself as disabled. After a physical exam, Titan’s physician concluded that Chalfant could work in his current capacity, and he was notified that he would be hired. Despite the notice, Nadis Barucic, a Titan employee, wrote “not pass px” at the top of Chalfant’s application, and he was not hired. He took a job with AMPCO Systems, a parking ramp management company.

This work involved walking up to five miles a day and lifting more weight than he had at Titan. In September, Titan eliminated its second shift. Chalfant filed a suit in a federal district court against Titan, in part, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Embedded System Design Vahid Givargis Pdf Merge. Titan argued that it had not hired Chalfant because he did not pass the physical, but no one—including Barucic—could explain why she had written “not pass px” on his application. Later, Titan claimed that Chalfant was not hired because the entire second shift was going to be eliminated.

Titan Distribution, Inc., 475 F.3d 982 (8th Cir. 2007)] (See page 693.) (a) What must Chalfant establish to make his case under the ADA?

Can he meet these requirements? (b) In employment-discrimination cases, punitive damages can be appropriate when an employer acts with malice or reckless indifference toward an employee’s protected rights. Would an award of punitive damages to Chalfant be appropriate in this case? Unfair Labor Practices Consolidated Stores is undergoing a unionization campaign. Prior to the union election, management states that the union is unnecessary to protect workers. Management also provides bonuses and wage increases to the workers during this period.

The employees reject the union. Union organizers protest that the wage increases during the election campaign unfairly prejudiced the vote. Should these wage increases be regarded as an unfair labor practice?